顯示具有 Counsel C Y Li 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Counsel C Y Li 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2014年7月16日 星期三

Senior Counsel C Y Li SC's Submission "Wholly Unsustainable" and Had "No Substance" - Said Poon J (法官說李秋源資深大律師的陳詞是無法維持及不真實的)

 
 
HCAL 72/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
NO 72 OF 2011
_______________

 
BETWEEN
吳文演1st Applicant
吳純純2nd Applicant
and
人事登記審裁處Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF REGISTRATIONInterested Party
 
_______________

Before : Hon Poon J in Court
Date of Hearing : 16-17 October 2013 and 10 December 2013
Date of Judgment : 29 January 2014

 
________________
 
JUDGMENT
________________
 
 
69....  Mr Li submitted in effect that since the Commissioner’s case against the applicants is based on the allegation that the 1st applicant had obtained the OWP unlawfully, which is criminal in nature, this entails the Tribunal applying the criminal standard of proof.  [Barrister Mr C Y Li SC's] submission is wholly unsustainable...
 
80.... I can see no substance in any of the points taken by [Senior Counsel Li Chau Yuen SC]...
 
 

2014年5月24日 星期六

CA Says Barrister C Y Li SC's Submissions "Absurd" (上訴庭說李秋源資深大律師的陳詞是荒謬的)

CA Says the Submissions of Senior Counsel Li Chau Yuen SC "Absurd" (上訴庭說李秋源資深大律師的陳詞是荒謬的)

HCMP 2409/2013
Before: Hon Kwan and Macrae JJA
Date of Decision: 9 January 2014 (paragraph 16)

(Source 1: http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=91009&currpage=T)

(Source 2: http://joycekwan20130602.blogspot.hk/2014/01/barrister-li-chau-yuen-senior-counsel-c-y-li-sc-absurd.html)

Lawyer Li Chau Yuen SC's Submission "Wholly Unsustainable" and Had "No Substance" - Said Poon J (法官說李秋源資深大律師的陳詞是無法維持及不真實的)

Barrister and Senior Counsel C Y Li SC's Submission "Wholly Unsustainable" and Had "No Substance" - Said Poon J (法官說李秋源資深大律師的陳詞是無法維持及不真實的)
 
HCAL 72/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
NO 72 OF 2011
_______________
BETWEEN
吳文演1st Applicant
吳純純2nd Applicant
and
人事登記審裁處Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF REGISTRATIONInterested Party
 
Before : Hon Poon J in Court
Date of Hearing : 16-17 October 2013 and 10 December 2013
Date of Judgment : 29 January 2014
 
________________
 
JUDGMENT
________________
  
69....  Mr Li submitted in effect that since the Commissioner’s case against the applicants is based on the allegation that the 1st applicant had obtained the OWP unlawfully, which is criminal in nature, this entails the Tribunal applying the criminal standard of proof.  [Barrister Mr C Y Li SC's] submission is wholly unsustainable...
 
80.... I can see no substance in any of the points taken by [Senior Counsel Li Chau Yuen SC]...
 
(Source 1: http://joycekwan20130602.blogspot.hk/2014/02/barrister-and-senior-counsel-li-chau-yuen-sc-c-y-li-sc-submissions-wholly-unsustainable-and-had-no-substance.html)

(Source 3: http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=91306&QS=%28%7B%E5%90%B3%E6%96%87%E6%BC%94%7D+%25parties%29&TP=JU)