HCAL 72/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
NO 72 OF 2011
_______________
BETWEEN
| ||
吳文演 | 1st Applicant | |
吳純純 | 2nd Applicant | |
and
| ||
人事登記審裁處 | Respondent | |
COMMISSIONER OF REGISTRATION | Interested Party |
Date of Hearing : 16-17 October 2013 and 10 December 2013
Date of Judgment : 29 January 2014
________________
JUDGMENT
________________
69.... Mr Li submitted in effect that since the Commissioner’s case against the applicants is based on the allegation that the 1st applicant had obtained the OWP unlawfully, which is criminal in nature, this entails the Tribunal applying the criminal standard of proof. [Barrister Mr C Y Li SC's] submission is wholly unsustainable...
80.... I can see no substance in any of the points taken by [Senior Counsel Li Chau Yuen SC]...
(Source 3: http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=91306&QS=%28%7B%E5%90%B3%E6%96%87%E6%BC%94%7D+%25parties%29&TP=JU)
沒有留言:
張貼留言