HCA 1508/2004
____________
BETWEEN
BRILLIANT (MAN SAU) ENGINEERING LIMITED (Plaintiff)
and
WONG CHAT CHOR, SAMUEL (1st Defendant)
CHINA TOP CONSULTANTS LIMITED (2nd Defendant)
____________
Date of Hearing: 12 April 2006
Date of Judgment (Handed Down): 3 May 2006
"... 21. ... what it really boils down to is the complaint that the 1st Defendant [Barrister Lawyer & Counsel Samuel CC Wong - 王則左大律師], by accepting instructions from the Plaintiff knowingly placed himself in a situation where his own personal interest (through the 2nd Defendant) conflicted with that of his client. They were both at the time “competing” with each other to be compensated by OLS. Whoever got to the winning post first, in terms of executing its judgment, achieved an enormous advantage, as in fact happened for the 2nd Defendant."
(Source 1: http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2006/445.html)
(Source 2: http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=52346&QS=%28wong%2Bchat%2Bchor%29&TP=JU)
沒有留言:
張貼留言